Organizational Change and Development

In the past, people study been treated the brass as a unkindly system, that is to say, organizational behavior and performance are the results from one-party decision by managers, ignoring the existence of the environs. However, as an dependent system, the organization and its external environment are fundamental interaction and mutual penetration. Environment should be seen as the organizational material, energy, the ultimate resource of information and the key to organization renewal.This paper will discuss the contribution of environmental determinist theories by interpreting institutional Theory, macrocosm Ecology, Resource Dependence Theory and Business Ecosystem Theory. 2. Institutional theory Starting from the sociological system theory, institutional theory focuses on the isomorphism and similar amidst organizations, and put it down to the requirements of the institutional environment foreign the organization. (Tidd, 2001) In institutional theory, the organization faces with two several(predicate) environments technical environment and institutional environment.Technological environment requires the organization must be efficient and unionised by the principle of maximum production, while the institutional environment requires organizations must be legitimacy. Meyer and Rowen pointed out that umpteen organizations even had to ask the internal operations disjointed from organizational structure in order to snub the negative impact from the institutional environment requests on the efficient operation. DiMaggio and Powell further put forward lead weapons lead to convergence of the organizational type and organizational behavior. Camarinha-Matos, & Afsarmanesh, 2007)The first one is forcing mechanisms, such as politics regulations and cultural expectations. The second one is imitation mechanism. When faces with irresolution problem, organizations bleed to adopt the solution used by other organizations in the same organizational field. The ratiocination one is regulatory mechanisms, which comes from development and complication of passkey networks in professional training, and organizational field.Sequential studies withdraw a large number of empirical analyses on the mechanism above. Take Galaskiewicz and Wasserman for example, they confirmed the importance of networking to the mechanism of imitation. They noted that, although the successful organization may be easy to become the object of imitation, the organization managers tend to imitate the organization they trust, such as those that have the interpersonal association with their own organization.